[Reader-list] A Just Peace in Kashmir? Reflections on

[Lalit Ambardar]

No. 







The ‘word’ was very
clearly meant to describe those who are very much ‘sighted’ but are undiscerning
& undiscriminating & because of their 'blind faith' see any objectivity
in that ‘propaganda’ paper.

 

And let us not digress,please.

 

Regards all

LA

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

> From: taraprakash at gmail.com
> To: lalitambardar at hotmail.com; justjunaid at gmail.com; 425063.70526.qm at web57205.mail.re3.yahoo.com; reader-list at sarai.net
> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] A Just Peace in Kashmir? Reflections on
> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 16:13:07 -0400
> 
> Dear all and dear LA.
> 
> The blind, just as the sighted throughout the world, will have different 
> opinions about this article. Some blind readers will find it biased, others 
> may find it objective. Whatever you wanted to state, please do not equate 
> blindness with foolishness. Let us not use the term "blind" in any 
> derogatory sense. The word means only one thing, a creature that does not 
> have eye-sight.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Lalit Ambardar" <lalitambardar at hotmail.com>
> To: <justjunaid at gmail.com>; <425063.70526.qm at web57205.mail.re3.yahoo.com>; 
> <reader-list at sarai.net>
> Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 10:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] A Just Peace in Kashmir? Reflections on
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > One must be blind to
> > miss the glaring bias in this what could best be described as propaganda 
> > material
> > (if this was an essay, then Goebbels deserved a ‘Noble’ for literature) .
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards all
> >
> > LA
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 21:38:12 +0530
> >> From: justjunaid at gmail.com
> >> To: 425063.70526.qm at web57205.mail.re3.yahoo.com; reader-list at sarai.net
> >> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] A Just Peace in Kashmir? Reflections on
> >>
> >> Hi Kshmendra,
> >>
> >> You have described Prof. Shapiro's essay as "replete with prejudice, 
> >> bias,
> >> ill-concieved presumptions and mis-constructed deductions". Could you
> >> actually elaborate and give reasons for your characterization of the 
> >> essay.
> >>
> >> Junaid
> >> _________________________________________
> >> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> >> Critiques & Collaborations
> >> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with 
> >> subscribe in the subject header.
> >> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> >> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > News, sports, entertainment and fine living…learn the ropes on MSN India
> > http://in.msn.com
> > _________________________________________
> > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> > Critiques & Collaborations
> > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with 
> > subscribe in the subject header.
> > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________
Sports, news, fashion and entertainment. Pick it all up in a package called MSN India
http://in.msn.com