[Reader-list] Jihadis abduct, rape young girls in Jammu -

[Pawan Durani]

Rakesh Ji ,

Any historical monument , which was originally built for some cause is
being looked after by Indian Goverment.

Kindly do not mislead by giving example of only Somnath temple , even
Jama Masjid in Delhi is renovated and masde beautiful with help of
public money by Goverment.

Thanks

Pawan

On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Rakesh Iyer<rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Malik jee
>
> I don't understand how skewed can your views be? The incident has been
> reported in the Daily Pioneer. What do you want? Do you want the case to run
> like 24- hr news item the way our media reports, and then reduce it to
> caricature?
>
> Do you want our newsprint media to also portray it the way they usually do,
> and thereby reduce it to just one news?
>
> Or do you want only all news of Hindu sufferings to be published, and no
> news of any Muslim or Christian or any other suffering to be banned?
>
> What do you want? What is your problem, if I may ask you? In anything and
> everything you see Muslim appeasement only.
>
> When the Indian govt decides to give Haj subsidies, it's Muslim appeasement.
> When the Indian govt decides to reserve seats for Indian Muslims, it's
> Muslim appeasement. When the Indian govt decides to set up bank branches in
> Muslim dominated areas, it's Muslim appeasement. Obeying the recommendations
> of the Sachar Committee Report is Muslim appeasement.
>
> But naming the missiles of India as 'Arjun' or giving them only Hindu
> mythical names is not appeasement. The decision of Indian govt to build the
> Somnath temple by public money is not appeasement. Neither is it appeasement
> to spend money of the public on Amarnath and Kedarnath yatras, even to give
> security there, that too by organizations other than the police. It's not an
> appeasement indeed to state that India is taken as a 'Hindu' rashtra (by the
> BJP govt of course).
>
> So giving money for temple construction or allowing people in the name of
> Hindutva to destroy mosques and mazars is not appeasement too.
>
> Malik jee, for every one argument you give about Muslim appeasement, I will
> give you an example of Hindu appeasement. And this will not end. What I want
> to know is this, what do you wish to portray through this end listing? And
> this is all for those who believe there is Muslim appeasment in India.
>
> Let me state the obvious here. India is a state where every community is
> appeased or sought to be appeased. It's a compromise with which we have to
> live. Otherwise, there always is the option of breaking away into 543 and
> more principalities where each minority section can live amongst themselves,
> produce amongst themselves and not bother others.
>
> Learn to compromise Malik jee. That's how we live as India. Otherwise, be
> prepared for thousands of partitions of India. And if you think partition is
> not trauma, remember 1947 or at least read about it. And for more, you can
> read about how Pakistan felt in 1971 after losing Bangladesh.
>
> I would have been happy if you had said that let's not stop at appeasement
> but take steps to improve the lives of people on the ground. But this is
> simply name calling and nothing else.
>
> Regards
>
> Rakesh
>