[Reader-list] Reservation for any caste, faith or community., is it rule od laws in democratic life.?

[A.K. Malik]

Dear Rakeshji,
                 It is a Constitutional impropriety imposed on us by the Parliamentarians.The reservation for SC/ST was only for initial 10 years after our Constitution was adopted.It has since been extended umpteen times every ten years and is still legally valid. Even SC can't do anything unless it becomes pro-active.There is still some hope for OBC reservation being struck down as the data on which it was based are under question.Rakeshjee, please try to understand if for each and everything you opine on,your advice is to go to SC, then I will have to be in SC eternally filing cases.Having a difference of opinion is not a crime. We undergo umpteen injustices day-in day-out, going to an ordinary court further aggravates it knowing fully what the courts do in our country.
You must have heard when a sting operation procured arrest warrants against the President of India and CJI of Supreme Court.
 
(A.K.MALIK)


--- On Thu, 5/21/09, Rakesh Iyer <rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Rakesh Iyer <rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Reservation for any caste, faith or community., is it rule od  laws in democratic life.?
> To: "Rajendra Bhat Uppinangadi" <rajen786uppinangady at gmail.com>
> Cc: akmalik45 at yahoo.com, c.anupam at gmail.com, "sarai list" <reader-list at sarai.net>
> Date: Thursday, May 21, 2009, 5:51 PM
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 5:48 PM,
> Rakesh Iyer <rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> Dear all
> 
> I think quite a lot has been said on this matter. If Rajen
> jee and Malik jee or anybody else feel it is still wrong, i
> would request them to go to the SC and file a PIL against
> it. After all, they can put forth their arguments there as
> well. That would be quite good too. And the SC can decide
> what is right and what is wrong then.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Rakesh
> 
> 
> 
>