[Reader-list] Marxism Exposed: How Labour And The Tories Are Destroying Britain

[Pawan Durani]

Part One: Birth Of The New Man

Introduction

Something is wrong with Great Britain and Western Civilisation. Badly
wrong. Imagine, if you will, that the brave warriors who fought to
preserve Great Britain from tyranny during the Second World War have
been resurrected and allowed to visit modern day Britain to see for
themselves the fruits of their sacrifice.

First, they would notice that there are hordes of aliens in all
British cities who are not British and never will be. Millions of
immigrants from Africa, Pakistan, India, China, Vietnam, Poland,
Romania, The Caribbean, all combining to introduce cultures and
traditions tolerated and regarded as equal - if not superior - to the
British culture.

Among these hordes are aliens who attack, rape including gang rape,
and murder British citizens throughout the realm. Immigrants who
organise in gangs and who wage gang wars on Britain's streets to
control territory. Territory used to traffic drugs and sex slaves to
make these criminal gangs vast amounts of money.

As the returning warriors walk around the cities, what would they make
of the minarets dominating the skylines, or indeed, of the numerous
once-Christian churches now transformed into Mosques where the two
million plus Muslims can practice their Islamic faith? And would they
be tempted to sample the culinary delights of 100% halal greasy kebabs
and spicy curries consumed en-masse by modern day Britons from scores
of restaurants and take-away establishments scattered in all British
towns and cities?

How would they react to what passes for en evening out in British
cities where hundreds of thousands of young Britons drink themselves
into a stupor, many lying unconscious in the streets, not to mention
the appalling levels of violence conducted by drunken louts, all now
accepted as "normal" on a night out.

Imagine their reaction on hearing the news that Great Britain, once
the world's leader in many industries, simply doesn't manufacture
anything any more. That the motor car,motor cycle, engineering, coal
and steel industries have all but gone or been taken over by foreign
companies. And that's before you break the news that major British
companies built off the backs of British workers over the years have
relocated factories to foreign lands in the search for cheap labour.

How proud would they feel to learn that since the end of the Second
World War, the political elite have gradually surrendered British
sovereignty without consulting the British people to a
European-centric organisation based in Brussels? An organisation that
passes 85% of the laws of Britain, an organisation whose elite are
composed of twenty-seven unelected politicians with zero
accountability to the British public? A public who by and large don't
even know such an elite group of politicians exist.

And speaking of politicians, can you imagine breaking the news that
the Labour and Conservative parties have waged two illegal wars, both
involving heinous war crimes against thousands of innocent people,
wars justified on both occasions on a pack of outrageous lies and
falsifications, spoon-fed to the British people by deceitful
politicians and a duplicitous politicized media?

Imagine telling these soldiers who fought and died for King and
country that the present monarch has given her assent for the
surrender of British sovereignty by repeatedly signing it away in the
full knowledge that her own people have never been consulted.

How would these brave warriors feel when they discover that while
British troops were fighting and dying in Iraq and Afghanistan, those
who sent them to war were busy pilfering the public purse at will,
using taxpayers' money to play the housing market and to pay for all
manner of expenses, from house cleaning to pornographic films?

To then inform them that on returning to Great Britain to march
through their home towns, British soldiers were abused as "murderers",
"cowards" and "baby killers" by fanatical Muslims who were permitted
by law to protest in this way would surely be very hard for them to
believe.

Can you imagine trying to explain to them that the desire to keep
Britain British, to assert that the British way of life should be
paramount in this land and that British people should come first is
regarded as a crime, punishable by law? And to attempt to explain the
nature of racism, that it is a crime only white people can commit, a
crime whites have committed throughout history and a crime for which
all whites, not just Britons, must be continually punished for, how on
earth do you think they would react?

Would they be able to even comprehend that the political elite have
been encouraging mass immigration from the third world into the realm
and that these immigrants are provided with housing, benefits,
healthcare and all manner of social services all paid for courtesy of
the British taxpayer? You would have to hand them a leaflet from the
NHS so they could see for themselves the number of foreign languages
they are printed in because many of these immigrants don't speak - and
refuse to learn - English.

As if all of that wasn't enough, imagine then informing them that
Great Britain is bankrupt and that incompetent and greedy bankers were
bailed out by British taxpayers without their assent. And that despite
this gross incompetence and shameful abuse of British taxpayers, the
British government still donates hundreds of millions of pounds of
taxpayers' money to third world countries and indeed, has stated that
this must continue with even more generosity.

And all of that is just scratching the surface. But when I thought
about how my Grandfather, Father and seven Uncles would react if I had
the chance to explain to them the state of modern-day Great Britain,
the nation they all sacrificed so much for, I believe they would ask a
very simple question:

"What the hell has happened to our country?"

The answer is complex, what has happened is nothing less than a crime
against humanity, conducted against the British people and indeed, the
entire white race and it has been deliberately conducted by cunning,
power-hungry politicians who are busy prosecuting one of the most
pernicious ideologies ever created by mankind. In this series of
essays, I will attempt to explain the true nature of this ideology and
the serious threat it presents to Western society, along with the
grave consequences it imposes upon human beings wherever it is
implemented.

What follows is the deeply unpleasant and disturbing truths Labour,
Conservative and Liberal politicians don't want the British people to
know. It's time for them to be outed for the evil charlatans they are
because every single individual in these parties is a willing disciple
of the ideology destroying Great Britain and the British people:

Marxism.

Partners In Anti-Human Crime

Whenever Marxism is mentioned, what is particularly striking is how
little most Britons know about it. Of course, many will mention that
it is "something to do with communism isn't it?", without realising
the anti-human nature of the philosophy Karl Marx and his fellow
socialist Friedrich Engels preached. Even more striking is how unaware
most people are about the serious consequences imposed upon humanity
because of the ideas and teachings of Marx and Engels.

Everything currently occurring in Great Britain and indeed, Western
civilisation is firmly rooted in the Marxist philosophy. But what,
exactly is Marxism all about? In 1848, the philosophy of Karl Marx was
published, entitled "The Communist Manifesto" and the first line of
the book states:

"The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class
struggles."

Such a simple sentence and yet straight away, one can see that Marx's
philosophy is all about dividing society into two distinct halves: The
ruling elite - the haves - and "the people" - the ruled, the
have-nots. In other words, the wealthy ruling class and the
impoverished working class.

The ruling class - the bourgeoisie - had achieved their wealth and
status through Capitalism and controlled the means of production,
namely employment, eduction and of course, finance. Marx asserted that
through Capitalism, the bourgeoisie exploited the working class and
that the Capitalist society must be destroyed and replaced by a
classless, stateless society, controlled by - and composed completely
of - the working class who would own the means of production.

This classless, stateless society is referred to as "pure Communism",
also referred to as "the second way" with the Capitalist society being
"the first way". The establishment of the classless, stateless society
could only come about through revolutionary action, a revolutionary
action that would need to be conducted internationally by workers to
ensure the total destruction of Capitalism.

As the Capitalist society is transformed into the pure-Communist
classless society, there will be a transitional socialist state called
"the revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat", the proletariat
being the working class. This dictatorship would be the replacement of
the "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie", the next step after the primary
revolutionary action towards the establishment of the stateless,
classless society.

So this is the core of Marxism, creating an International socialist
stateless society with the means of production owned and controlled by
the working class. Marxism asserts that the weak working class are the
victims of the strong ruling class who exploit the working class
through their labour because the bourgeoisie own and control the means
of production. This is the first, core assertion of inequality and
victim-hood in the Marxist ideology and future disciples of Marx and
Engels recognised the power of it and would ensure it would become a
key tactic in their determined struggle to destroy the Capitalist
society.

An Oppressive Deity

Capitalism was not the only system Marx despised. Although born a Jew,
his parents had both converted to Christianity and Marx was baptised
at age six. But Marx was not raised in any faith, rather in a house
devoid of religion and perhaps this sewed the seeds for another core
of Marxist philosophy: The hatred of religion.

Marx was quite open about his hatred of religion and vehemently
professed his atheism, indeed the very nature of the Marxist

ideology is Anti-Christian and Anti-Jewish. One doesn't need to be a
graduate of Judeo-Christian theology to realise that anybody who
believes in violent revolution simply cannot be a Jew or a Christian.

So why did Marx have nothing but contempt for religion?

Marx's views on Christianity originated from the German philosopher
Ludwig Feuerbach and his "The Essence Of Christianity where he
asserted that there is no God or no Jesus Christ or religion, that
these are merely creations of man's imagination resulting "from man's
miserable existence that he feels the need to invent God." Feuerbach
believed that religion is just a manifestation of the true inner
nature of human beings, and therefore, only the material world and
humanity exist, there is no spirit or afterlife.

Both Feuerbach and Marx were heavily influenced by the philosophies of
another German, Georg Hegel. Feuerbach was a member of the Young
Hegelians - also known as the Left Hegelians - and they created a
radical interpretation of Hegel's dialectic march of the spirit
throughout history to mean that both Western civilisation - i.e.
Capitalism - and its institutions - Religion, especially Christianity,
would be overcome and replaced with superior systems, particularly
socialism.

Marx was heavily influenced by Feuerbach's views on religion and
elaborated on them. He asserted that as part of the revolutionary
action, man would be brought to the stage where he no longer needed
religion. In the classless, stateless socialist utopian society,
religion would be abolished because Marx believed it contained the
root of the misery inflicting mankind, in his own words:

"The criticism of religion is therefore in embryo the criticism of the
vale of woe, the halo of which is religion".

But his hatred for religion was not solely confined to criticising
religion as being responsible for the misery of mankind. Marx saw
religion as a weapon of control wielded by the bourgeoisie to keep the
working class in squalor, under the comforting illusion that they
would be rewarded in a non-existent afterlife. The promise of the
classless stateless society would give the oppressed and exploited
working class a better, happier life here on earth.

Again, Marx stated:

"Religion is the sign of the oppressed creature, the heart of the
heartless world, just as it is the spirit of a spiritless situation.
It is the opium of the people".

Many people are aware of the last line, a line often quoted by critics
of religion but I wonder how many of these people who quote Marx are
aware of the hatred this atheist philosopher had for all religions?

By asserting that Capitalism and it's institutions such as Religion
needed to be destroyed through violent revolution and replaced with a
system that will abolish them and not tolerate those who follow them,
one can note that Marx's philosophy is an ideology born out of a
bitter resentment and a seething hatred for the two systems he
directed his vitriol against: Capitalism and Religion. Yet there is a
glaring contradiction that provides a striking contrast between how
this socialist actually lived his life and the Marxist ideology he
preached.

Reaping The Benefits

Marx did not create the Marxist philosophy by himself, he was aided
and abetted by his close friend Friedrich Engels, the son of a wealthy
German textile manufacturer. Whilst Marx lived in poverty, it was a
self-inflicted poverty, shunning the need to work for a living so he
could write down the philosophy of Marxism. Even after Marx married
and had a child, he refused to work and earn an wage to support and
feed himself and his wife and child. Marx and his family survived
courtesy of the charity of others, especially from Engels and his
wealthy family, yet charity is firmly rooted in both Capitalism and
Religion, and curiously, this hypocrisy of Marx is conveniently rarely
ever mentioned.

Equally rarely mentioned is the fact that while Marx benefited from
the charity of Engels and his capitalist family - Engels actually took
a clerk's job to support his friend, a job he hated - and of course,
from the generosity of many others, he placed his hatred for
Capitalism and Religion above the welfare of his own family who he
kept firmly ensconced in squalor.

This, the same enlightened godfather of the socialists who raged about
the unjust exploitation of the working class yet had no problem
whatsoever in exploiting his wife and child in such a heartless
manner. He showed no remorse, merely stating that were he to have his
time again he would not have married. Such an uncaring attitude and an
indifference towards the feelings and needs of his own family offer
clear evidence that Karl Marx was driven not by a love for humanity
but by a hatred of human beings who accepted the systems he despised
and that spreading this hatred via the gospel of Marxism was regarded
as much more important than providing and caring for his own family.

These very important obligations for a Husband and Father were
completely dependent upon the charity and generosity of many others
who were, just like Engels' family, a part of the capitalist and
Christian societies he was determined to destroy. Tellingly, this
hatred for human beings who want to live in a capitalist society and
have the freedom to worship their chosen Deity remains a feature of
the disciples of Marx and Engels to the present day, as British
Nationalists such as myself can testify after being on the receiving
end of hate-filled invective spewed-out by liberal-socialists towards
human beings who refuse to accept their "perfect" socialist Utopia.

It is important to fully understand that as Marx regarded religion as
a weapon used to further oppress the working class, a Marxist
stateless, classless socialist society cannot and will not include
Religion. This is absolutely fundamental to Marxism and this also
carries with it another fact:

An individual cannot be a Marxist and a Christian, just as an
individual cannot be a Christian and a Satanist. One of Marx's most
devout apostles, Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, summed up the Marxist attitude
towards God and religion:

"Every religious idea, every idea of God, every flirtation with the
idea of God is unutterable vileness. . . . vileness of the most
dangerous kind, 'contagion' of the most abominable kind. Millions of
sins, filthy deeds, acts of violence and physical contagions . . . are
far less dangerous than the subtle, spiritual idea of a God."

It is quite clear that Marxism is an atheist ideology with a
world-view that clashes completely with the world view of
Christianity. Yet as the Christian church has been relentlessly
assaulted by Marxists for the best part of a century and is now in a
state of terminal decline, the clergy from the Christian faiths and
many remaining Christians embrace the Marxist ideology and it's
desired classless, stateless socialist society.

As hypocrisy blinded both Marx and Engels, it seems that their modern
day disciples share the same affliction. Perhaps this is because of
the inversion of morality inherent in Christian theology identified by
the brilliant philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche whereby the weak and the
exploited are moral and the strong and powerful are immoral. One can
see why Nietzsche predicted that Christianity would be abandoned but
that this moral inversion would be retained and it is an inversion of
morality that fits very comfortably with the theories of Marx and
Engels and their disciples who have prosecuted the establishment of
the classless socialist Utopia these two Godfathers of Marxism
invented.

But Marx's hatred for Capitalism and Religion didn't end with them. He
also nurtured another hatred rarely mentioned by the cunning left and
their lick-spittle lackeys.

Feel Like A New Man

As Marx hated both Capitalism and Religion, it logically follows that
the project to establish the stateless, classless society requires
people who do not believe in God and who reject Capitalism. Now we see
for the first time the dangerous, anti-human ground Marx and his
socialist philosophy entered, totalitarian ground to impose by any
means necessary the classless, stateless socialist Utopia.

The stateless, classless society is to be International - make that
global - and would manifest after a violent revolution conducted by
the working classes. Those who are part of the revolution and the
classless socialist Utopia will be "the new order", without class or
religion. They will be collectivist rather than individualist with
individuals being de-constructed so they regard themselves as "the new
man", a one-world stateless citizen living in "people's communities".

All ruled of course by an elite socialist party who brainwash the
masses to accept the socialist doctrine. Today, that is exactly what
is being performed by the lib/lab/con in Great Britain and by the
entire European Union as we shall see in the follow-up essays.

For the first time in human history, Marx laid down the concept of "a
new man". A man devoid of individuality, Godless, and most certainly
not capitalist. It's easy then to believe that when Karl Marx and
Friedrich Engels refer to a violent revolution, that they are
referring to a class war and that this war would be about the
extermination of the ruling elites.

Not so. Writing in the January 1849 edition of Marx's journal "Neue
Rheinische Zeitung" Engels states that when the class war happens,
there will be societies in Europe who are two stages behind. These
were the societies who had not yet implemented Capitalism and
therefore, the people in those societies could not be revolutionised.
People such as the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders and
the Slavs (Croats, Czechs, Magyars, Poles, Serbs, Slovenians). Engels
referred to these human beings as:

Völkerabfälle - "Racial Trash"

Marx himself clears up any misunderstanding:

"Classes and races too weak to master the new conditions of life must
give way and perish in the revolutionary holocaust."

These statements amount to nothing less than a call for the extinction
of entire indigenous peoples of the European continent. It is an
assertion of racial superiority, an arrogant assessment that one group
of people have the right to pick and choose who has the right of life
based solely on racial lines which preclude involvement in the "new
order", the stateless, classless Utopia.

Marx in his own words again:

"The coming world war will cause not only reactionary classes and
dynasties, but entire reactionary peoples, to disappear from the face
of the earth."

How very elitist. What struck me as curious is that these two
socialists hated Capitalism but regarded people as "racial trash"
simply because they had not implemented Capitalism in their societies.

Once again, Marx demonstrates it is perfectly acceptable to exploit,
oppress and even execute those who will not or cannot be part of the
socialist classless Utopia yet this is a man who hated the ruling
elites for exploiting and oppressing the proletariat. It becomes
clearer and clearer that the Marxist revolution is all about replacing
one group of elitist exploiters with another. A group who masquerade
as victims fighting against oppression but who also believe in
oppressing and eliminating human beings who disagree with them or who
are deemed incapable of adapting to the "new man" classless, stateless
Marxist utopia.

Live The Dream

What would life be like in Marx's classless, stateless society, a
"pure communist" world? To be fair, there are some laudable policies.
Child labour would be abolished with free education provided to all
children. The inequalities between cities, towns and country would be
reduced so that the population would be more evenly distributed. But
things don't get much better from there.

All property would be owned by the government and private ownership of
industry - Capitalism - would be eradicated. All land would be rent to
public purposes, owning your own home would not be an option. Added to
this is the complete abolishment of inheritance with all property
owned by those deemed unfit for the socialist utopia confiscated.

ALL religion would be abolished. This may be seen by many as a good
thing even though they aren't Marxists or Socialists. I confess that I
have sympathy with Marx's assessment of how religion has been used to
control and exploit people, but I also have first-hand experience of
how faith can provide so much comfort to believers in their times of
need. There can be little doubt that organised religion in its various
forms has caused enormous suffering to human beings around the world
and it still is, witness the horrors of Islam. But as the world's
first pure Communist state, the USSR discovered, banning religion
isn't as easy as the Marxists imagined.

The government would exert control over the lives of the citizens.
Transport and communications infrastructure would be centralised and
run by the government and the entire banking system would also be
centralised and government controlled. Credit would be issued by the
government through a single national bank.

To exert so much control over the people requires more and more
government and more and more government means less individual freedoms
and higher and higher taxation. Employment would be controlled by the
state with armies of workers created to fill factories, governmental
departments, cultivate unused land and create a thriving agricultural
industry.

Democracy would not exist, governance would be conducted by an elite
group of socialists who would form the "dictatorship of the
proletariat" which in time would no longer be needed with the "new
order" established whereby goods and services are provided solely
according to need. This is the ultimate goal of pure Communism, a
stateless, classless society without government, where the workers of
the world will have been completely liberated freed from the
oppression of the bourgeoisie.

Establishing this global, classless, stateless society is not an easy
task nor something that can happen quickly. Marx and Engels, without
doubt two of the most evil men to have ever lived, had created the
blueprint for the overthrow of the bourgeoisie and the liberation of
the working classes. For the classless, stateless global society to
become a reality, this blueprint would need to be significantly
expanded upon, a major challenge presented to the committed socialists
who followed in the footsteps of the Godfathers of Marxism. It was a
challenge they accepted and prosecuted with relish as we shall see in
the next essay.

Conclusion

There are several core issues to take from this essay regarding the
nature of Marxism, issues British patriots should raise each time the
issue of socialism is discussed. I believe most people - including
socialists themselves - are unaware of the true nature of Marx and
Engels' ideology. So, to summarise:

1. Capitalism allows the ruling elite - the bourgeoisie - to exploit
the working class because they own the means of production.

2. Capitalism must be replaced by a GLOBAL classless, stateless,
socialist society.

3. The classless, stateless society will be brought into being by
violent revolution.

4. The second stage will be the establishment of the "dictatorship of
the proletariat" who will own the means of production.

5. Religion will be abolished and democracy will cease to exist.

6. The "new man" will be Godless, stateless and classless,
collectivist and not individualist.

7. Human beings who refuse to become the "new man" or who cannot
because of their race become a part of the "new order" MUST "perish in
the holocaust".

8. Pure Communism will exist when goods and services are provided
according to need, this will herald the end of the need for government
and true freedom for the working class will have been established.

I encourage the reader to not only raise these issues when discussing
the evolution of socialism, but to also think about how these issues
are currently being played out in the International political arena,
especially with organisations such as the European Union and the
United Nations, and there will be more about these institutions in
this series.

Source : http://www.thegreenarrow.co.uk/index.php/writers/reconquista/1331-marxism-exposed-how-labour-and-the-tories-are-destroying-britain