[Reader-list] Gujarat's secular development

Sun Jun 13 12:10:28 IST 2010

Dear Raheema,

Thanks for your views with due respect. Term nationalization you mentioned is I think nationalism which you consider as jargon. Nationalism is most essential for any country to grow healthily and so the discipline also, where we lack much today. Countries like Japan and Germany are examples of it. Tremendous nationalism, discipline of Japan helped to grow in very short span even after nuclear attack. What to tell about secularism? Our society is become pseudo-secular and this is real danger what I feel. Nobody knows real secularism or if knows than also want to remain pseudo-secular for their selfish or vote bank motto. But, time will come that lowest of the lower people will understand this and will come out of trap of politics.

I have some reservations with your statement, “Muslims in Gujarat is now much more manageable”. But, why to compromise? Please do not compromise. The Muslim populations cannot able to manage in other states in comparison, so in that case why they are able to manage in Gujarat only? So, naturally there must be difference somewhere in other state and Gujarat and that you know very well I don’t want to clarify it.

Please note that no one in India is against any community, the oppose is against the community of terrorism, criminals whoever involved in it irrespective of any religion. Few people of the respected community physical/mental support to terrorism tarnish the image of that community. 

So, self respect, self retrospect is the best way for everyone and it will be better not to compromise and make manageable yourself.

Thanks
Bipin

From: Raheema Begum [mailto:theunderscoredhood at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 4:06 PM
To: Bipin Trivedi
Cc: sarai-list
Subject: Re: [Reader-list] Gujarat's secular development

Hi,

I've been following this discussion briefly, and this article is interesting, thanks for posting it.But I suppose terms like nationalisation and secular have now become mere jargon.
I'm sure that the Muslim population in Gujarat is now much more manageable, considering we got rid of so many of them.Such pristine logic would praise Hitler for his exemplary administrative skills, and yes indeed, we should look at the bright side of things.

Raheema.

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Bipin Trivedi <aliens at dataone.in> wrote:

The Sachar Committee report indirectly challenges other states to emulate Gujarat chief minister's policy of secular development and ‘nationalise' it
By Pravin Sheth

http://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/article/59/20100527201005270359478766a84c375/Gujarat%E2%80%99s-secular-development.html

In setting up the Sachar Committee, the UPA government had its own objectives. Contrary to the expectations of Chief Minister Narendra Modi's critics, the committee's comparative statewise statistics of parameters like education, employment and income of the Muslim population living in the country proves Gujarat is far ahead of other states, even those ruled by so-called secular parties.

In terms of literacy, Muslims in Gujarat stood at 73.5% as compared to the national average of 59.1. The figure for urban males is 76, and 81 for those in rural areas as compared to the national average of 70 and 62 respectively in similar categories.

The average literacy rate of Muslim women in urban Gujarat is five points higher than the national average, whereas those in rural Gujarat fare even better with a literacy rate of 57 per cent as compared to the national average of 43.

A greater percentage of Muslims here have attained primary, secondary and higher-secondary level education. The national average is 60.9%. Muslim children in Gujarat are benefiting from equal opportunities to access secondary schooling as other children.

Take other aspect of economic well-being of Muslims in Gujarat. Here also, the Sachar Committee dispels the myth.

The report counters the propaganda that injustice is being done to the Muslim community in Gujarat

The per month per capita income of Muslims in urban Gujarat is an average Rs 875 — more than the national average of Rs 804. In contrast, it is Rs 662 in UP, Rs 748 in West Bengal, Rs 811 in Punjab, Rs 803 in Andhra Pradesh and Rs 837 in Karnataka.

In rural Gujarat, the per capita monthly income of Muslims is 20-25% more than the Muslims living in rural areas of most other states. On an average, it comes to Rs 668 compared to the national average of Rs 553.

In terms of Muslims living below poverty line, Gujarat improved from 54% in 1987-88 to 34% in 2004-2005, showing a healthy pace of improvement. Even in terms of share of Muslims in state employment, it is 5.4% in Gujarat while it is 2.1% in West Bengal, 3.2% in Delhi and 4.4% in Maharashtra.

Overall, the total picture counters the propaganda that injustice is being done to Muslims in Gujarat. The Sachar Committee on educational condition clearly shows that the Muslims of Gujarat are progressing well in the field of education and economic well-being. They are well cared for. The facts on their economic conditions dispel similar myths about their being discriminated against or being denied equal opportunity.

The fact is echoed by the Imam of Jama Masjid in Ahmedabad, who reportedly commented sometime back "Muslims have an opportunity to prosper in the peaceful environment that the Modi government has created. Modi has provided an atmosphere which is conducive for those who want to trade peacefully in Gujarat".

The Sachar report indirectly challenges other states to emulate Modi's policy of secular development and ‘nationalise' it.

Ironically, vociferous secularists are silent regarding the findings. They continue to focus on Modi-1 as branded during the 2002 carnage and Sohrabuddin encounter — a chief minister habitually noted to dishonour the rule of law, a friend of corporate magnets to the detriment of villagers and SEZ-affected disadvantaged.

However, there is popularly a more accepted Modi-2 — a dynamic CM realising the Delhi-Mumbai Industrial Corridor, the Special Investment Regions, port-based development, ‘Hopenhagen', BRTS, GDP, and much more.

But the two Modis fail to merge as some anti-Modi ideologues refuse to discern the significant transformation in his leadership.

Can Modi, hubris-free, demonstrate his transformation to abridge this perception-reality gap?

Source Link: http://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/article/59/20100527201005270359478766a84c375/Gujarat%E2%80%99s-secular-development.html

_________________________________________
reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
Critiques & Collaborations
To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in the subject header.
To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>

-- 
Kauntext, my Blog: http://raahi.wordpress.com
labels: http://whosebody.wordpress.com 
One State Solution Blog:http://onestatesolution.wordpress.com 
---------------------------------------------------------------