[Reader-list] Geelani announced one Article of the Constitutionof Free Kashmir - its "Liquor Policy"
SJabbar
sonia.jabbar at gmail.com
Sun Oct 24 09:16:17 IST 2010
Dear Pheeta Ram (why on earth don't you use your real name?),
You seem very clear about stone-pelters not being part of a well-thought out
and sustained political program, but victims who are merely reacting to the
violence of a tyrant.
I am re-posting an article that I have circulated on the Sarai List before
and I apologize to those who have read it already. The reason I am doing
this is that the author seems to suggest a far more complex political
reality than your tyrant-victim story. In fact, it suggests that your
victim pretty much tyrannizes a scared and hapless population caught between
literally a rock and a hard place.
Revolutions are exciting; and revolutionaries are the most romantic of
heroic figures. It's hard not to be spellbound when we see what appears to
be one happening in our midst. But there are lessons to be learned in
history. The fall of a tyrant doesn't automatically usher in an era of
peace and prosperity. The fall of the Bastille and the end of the French
monarchy did not usher in democracy or the French Republic. The fall of the
Bastille was followed by a period of great anarchy, of the Great Terror,
wars, a military dictatorship and a France headed by an emperor! This was
followed by wars, the restoration of the monarchy, dictatorships, more wars,
and 2 short-lived republics. It took 100 years before France settled down
to being a republic-- so much for the speed and efficacy of revolutions.
Best,
sj
Kashmir story tragic, pathetic and sad
Manzoor Anjum
It is almost one month, life in Valley is frozen. Tourists have abandoned
Kashmir; hotels are deserted; shops and other business establishment are
shut and schools are closed. Most of the people are confined to the four
walls of their homes; play grounds are missing the jolly kicks of local
footballers and ebullient hits of young cricketers. And little kids,
confined to their homes, are wondering why they are not allowed to go to the
schools. This is happening so because the Hurriyat Conference led by senior
separatist leader Syed Ali Geelani {and thus known as Hurriyat (G)} is
issuing weekly strike and protest programmes. People are asked to observe
strikes and take to streets in protest and they do so. Government retaliates
by imposing curfew and restrictions; people defy curfew; clashes take place;
bullets are fired and people die.
People adhere to Hurriyat (G) calendar and therefore the conglomerate is
genuinely happy that its writ runs and that it has made the state government
a failure. The leadership of the amalgam would be proud that it has
succeeded in making things difficult for the government. This success
demands that the pot is kept boiling and that is what Hurriyat (G) is doing
right now.
The government, both state as well as central, agencies have failed to find
any trace of Massarat Alam and Asiya Andrabi, who are busy issuing fresh
progammes of agitation. Government claims that there are just a few stone
pelters disturbing the peace but fact of the matter is that ³these few² are
strong enough to keep thousands of police and CRPF personnel on tenterhooks.
So it is Hurriyat (G) that runs the show and is in full command of the
situation. And the way the conglomerate¹s programmes are success, one can
conclude safely that people of Kashmir are with no one but Hurriyat (G) and
this separatist amalgam is proving a success story. However, this is only
one side of the story.
When indefinite strikes started telling upon peoples¹ nerves; when their
stomachs started churning for food; shops of essential commodities started
opening by fives and tens in different markets. People, desperate to get
eatables, rushed to these shops; some public transport including
auto-rickshaws started plying on roads. And that was it!
Groups of youth emerged on streets and forced the shopkeepers to pull the
shutters of their shops down. They attacked vehicles and thrashed auto
drivers. Private schools were warned not to open and Srinagar Municipal
Corporation (SMC) trucks, that dared to venture into old city to clean it of
thousands of MT of garbage that has piled their during protest and curfew
days, were attacked and one truck set ablaze.
So much so, in a shameful act, stone pelters thrashed some women with nettle
near Handwara who were on way to some wedding and had thus defied the
Hurriyat (G) protest orgramme. In interior localities of Srinagar, young
boys attacked shops raising slogans ³Deen Ke Aage Duniya Kya² (How does
world matter when it comes to religion). And thus Hurriyat (G) programme
becomes a grand success. This is another side of the story. In one month, 17
precious lives have been lost; the academic career of children is
devastated; Valley has suffered loses of nearly Rs. 8000 crores and what has
been achieved? When protests in Kashmir were at the peak, foreign ministers
of India and Pakistan met in Islamabad. Given the situation in Kashmir, one
would have expected Kashmir on the top of the agenda. But Pakistan foreign
minister himself admitted that Indian side showed no interest to talk about
this issue.
Despite the troubled situation here, Kashmir has hardly found any mention in
international media and even Indian and Pakistani media doesn¹t give a hoot
to whatever is happening here. Neither UN has taken any note, nor European
Union, OIC or any other world body. Yes, if anything has been achieved that
is a statement from Amnesty International seeking release of arrested
lawyers and establishment of juvenile homes for younger prisoners. And
tragic side of the story is that innocent people are made to believe that
this agitation will get them freedom.
As the chaos and confusion lingers on, voices from the very separatist camp
are being raised against the frequent strikes. United Jehad Council (UJC)
chief, Syed Sallahudin counseled the Hurriyat (G) not to go for indefinite
strikes and while agitating, remain mindful of economy and education. Though
the counsel was not taken well by stone pelters who even resented it but the
question is why Sallahudin take one month to come out with such a sensible
statement. Jamaat-e-Islami, that happens to be a constituent of Hurriyat (G)
too has come out with identical statement asking leaders¹ to issue
programmes in such a way that people are not stretched beyond their
capacity. Jamaat and Sallahudin could have issued the same statements a few
weeks back. Why did they not do so? Is it that they too were in the illusion
that the agitational calendar of Hurriyat (G) will fetch Azadi? If yes, it
could be termed as the saddest side of the whole story.
And the dangerous side of the story is that following Syed Sallahudin¹s
statements, newspapers received emails from anonymous people using
derogatory language against him. In some parts of Valley, his effigies were
burnt and a group of stone pelters addressed a press conference saying those
who oppose the present strike and agitation are traitors. It indicates that
there is a strong voice within separatist camp that is interested in
continuation of strike. Earlier, the separatists would be seen in two camps
hardliners and moderates. But now it is clear that there are groups within
groups. There are hardliners and ultra hardliners; there are moderates and
pseudo-moderates. The divisions within separatist ranks have already
resulted into deaths and destruction. One wonders whether a new phase of
infighting is in the making.
History tells us that when oppression and suppression reaches its all
notorious heights, nations revolt. People ready themselves to do anything
and everything to break the chains of slavery. They burry the apprehensions
of death, destruction and defeat and revolt with full force. And at such a
stage, the nations need leadership of wisdom and foresight. Such a
leadership channelizes the peoples¹ sentiments and emotions; polishes their
anger and directs them in the right direction. And when such leadership is
not in sight, the anger turns into madness and people inflict more wounds to
themselves. They enter a self-destructive mode and do everything that makes
suffer none but the revolting people. History has so many such instances to
teach us but unfortunately we are reluctant to learn. Freedom is a
consensual ideal of a people. Without having a consensus and by imposing
dictates, only disastrous results are to be expected.
Na Kissi Pe Zakham Ayaan Koi, Na Kissi Ko Fikr Rafoo Ki Hai;
Na Karam Hai Hum Pe Habeeb Ka, Na Nigah Hum Pe Adoo Ki Hai.
(Neither anyone looks at our wounds, nor anyone tries to heal them; we are
bereft of the love of our beloved and even the scorn of our foe).
The author is the editor of Urdu daily Uqab and the article is translated
from Urdu.
On 24/10/10 3:00 AM, "Pheeta Ram" <pheeta.ram at gmail.com> wrote:
> Any act of self-defense against a tyrant is never violence. Any act by
> a
tyrant, however seemingly benevolent, is always violence.
If i catch you by
> your throat and you try to push me in order to save
yourself, would you like
> to call your act of self-defense 'violence'? You
won't. It is the will to
> self-preservation that makes life possible on this
earth. Try choking yourself
> to death, you can't for your own body shall
rebel against you, it shall
> breathe itself out of your grasp. The right to
rebellion is inbuilt in the
> human body, is always already given. Bodies
don't lie!
Remember, little David
> brought down the giant Goliath by stones. The
mythical image of the
> stone-pelter goes back ages. Please don't bullshit
about unholy
> 'violence-non-violence' dyad, it gives bullshit a bad name!
On Sun, Oct 24,
> 2010 at 1:35 AM, TaraPrakash <taraprakash at gmail.com> wrote:
> But dear Inder
> Salim ji. I think I read that statement and expressed my
> skepticism. If
> Inder Salim ji says he does not support violence but
> glorifies stone pelters
> on any forum to do with Kashmiri separatists, I will
> have reason to be
> skeptical about his statement about nonviolence.
>
> ----- Original Message
> ----- From: "Inder Salim" <indersalim at gmail.com>
> To: "reader-list"
> <reader-list at sarai.net>
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2010 3:52 AM
>
>
> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] Geelani announced one Article of the
>
> Constitutionof Free Kashmir - its "Liquor Policy"
>
>
> But dear Taraprakash
> ji
>> Shudda concludes
>>
>> "By the way, none of this means that I agree with
> Mr. SAS Geelani;s
>> vision of the future. I am merely stating the facts that
> I know and
>> witnessed."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Inbox
>> X
>>
>> cashmeeri
>>
> Geelani announced one Article of the Constitution of Free Kashmir - its
>>
> "Liqu...
>>
>> 2:38 PM (22 hours ago)
>>
>> Reply
>>
>> |
>> Shuddhabrata
> Sengupta
>> Well, on these grounds, Syed Ali Shah Geelani is more moderate
> than
>> Mohandas ...
>>
>> 3:03 PM (22 hours ago)
>> Shuddhabrata
> SenguptaLoading...
>> 3:03 PM (22 hours ago)
>> Shuddhabrata Sengupta
>> to
> cashmeeri, Sarai
>>
>> show details 3:03 PM (22 hours ago)
>>
>>
>>
>> Well,
> on these grounds, Syed Ali Shah Geelani is more moderate than
>> Mohandas
> Karamchand Gandhi, who advocated total prohibition,
>> (regardless of whether
> one was or was not a believer in any religion)
>> and was even against the
> drinking of tea. Does that mean that we think
>> that his vision of 'Ram
> Rajya' would be identical to what Aalok Aima
>> considers to be an Islamic
> state?
>>
>> Incidentally, the state of Gujarat, has consistently imposed
> total
>> prohibition in deference to M.K. Gandhi's ideas on prohibition for
> as
>> long as it has existed as a state of the Indian Union. So, as per Mr.
>>
> Aima's suggestion, would we now be prepared to admit that Mr. Modi's
>>
> Gujarat (and the Gujarat of all his predecessors) is the closest we
>> have
> come to having an 'islamic State' in India. Oh no, the closest we
>> actually
> came to being an Islamic state in India was actually during
>> Morarji Desai;s
> prime ministership, when some of the current champions
>> of Hindutva were in
> power, when total prohibition was imposed on all
>> of India. In fact we came
> even closer than the vision of SAS Geelani,
>> which at least allows the
> 'non-believer' his or her daily tipple?
>> Incidentally, Mr. Geelani went on
> to suggest that if a bottle of
>> alchohl belongiing to a non believer was
> willingly or unwillingly
>> damaged by a Muslim, then the state would have to
> compensate the
>> non-believer for that damage. I haven;t quite heard of an
> Islamic
>> state willing to pay people to drink alchohl (if their bottle has
> been
>> damaged). He went on to quote an 'aayat' that said - "Muslims, do
> not
>> insult even the idols (but) of the idol worshippers, for they will
>>
> insult your God in return" and that the obligations of humanity are
>> binding
> in our relations even with those we consider to be our
>> enemies.
> Interesting stuff, coming as it does from the man who is so
>> offen held up
> as a figure of inflexible bigotry.
>>
>> By the way, none of this means that I
> agree with Mr. SAS Geelani;s
>> vision of the future. I am merely stating the
> facts that I know and
>> witnessed.
>>
>> best
>>
>> Shuddha
>> - Show quoted
> text -
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22-Oct-10, at 2:38 PM, cashmeeri wrote:
>>
>> - Show
> quoted text -
>>
>> Geelani announced one Article of the Constitution of
> Free Kashmir
>> - its "Liquor Policy":
>>
>>
> http://www.prokerala.com/news/articles/a176267.html
>>
>> "The system of
> justice in an independent Jammu and Kashmir would
>> be such that even liquor
> would not be banned for non-Muslims. It would
>> be prohibited fo......r the
> Muslim majority but if minorities feel
>> they want to have liquor they would
> be allowed to consume as their
>> right,"
>>
>> Hello!!!! Hello!!!!
>> I
> thought it was going to be a Secular Free Kashmir. This sounds
>> suspiciously
> like an Islamic Free Kashmir.
>>
>> Interesting prospect : Free Kashmir
> ..... no Non-Muslims ..... no Liquor
>>
>> Maybe it is the "Tourism
> Policy"
>>
>> ............. aalok aima
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _________________________________________
>> reader-list: an open discussion
> list on media and the city.
>> Critiques & Collaborations
>> To subscribe:
> send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>> subscribe in the
> subject header.
>> To unsubscribe:
> https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>> List archive:
> <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>>
>>
>> Shuddhabrata
> Sengupta
>> The Sarai Programme at CSDS
>> Raqs Media Collective
>>
> shuddha at sarai.net
>> www.sarai.net
>> www.raqsmediacollective.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _________________________________________
>> reader-list: an open discussion
> list on media and the city.
>> Critiques & Collaborations
>> To subscribe:
> send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>> subscribe in the
> subject header.
>> To unsubscribe:
> https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>> List archive:
> <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>> Reply
>>
>> Reply to
> all
>>
>> Forward
>>
>>
>>
>> Reply
>>
>> |
>> TaraPrakash
>> to Shuddhabrata,
> cashmeeri, Sarai
>>
>> show details 9:49 PM (15 hours ago)
>>
>> The point
> probably the mailer was making and you are missing is that
>> the assumption
> is that SASG's "free" Kashmir will be primarily an
>> Islamic state that will
> allow some unislamic things to happen. This is
>> the same vision of Hindu
> Rashtra that Advani was selling to Indians
>> when BJP was being seen as
> taking power away in India.
>>
>> That you don't necessarily agree with SASG
> makes no freaking sense to
>> me especially when you have unequivocally
> blatantly unskeptically
>> defended and justified SASG on this forum. By
> becoming a SASG stooge
>> you have joined the ranks of RSS. By putting SASG
> and MK Gandhi in the
>> same sentence you killed the embodiment of nonviolence
> once more, and
>> joined RSS ranks in more than one way.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shuddhabrata Sengupta" <
>>
> shuddha at sarai.net>
>> To: "cashmeeri" <cashmeeri at yahoo.com>
>> Cc: "Sarai"
> <reader-list at sarai.net>
>> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 5:33 AM
>> Subject:
> Re: [Reader-list] Geelani announced one Article of the
>> Constitutionof Free
> Kashmir - its "Liquor Policy"
>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Well, on these grounds, Syed Ali Shah Geelani is more moderate
>> than
> Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, who advocated total prohibition,
>> (regardless of
> whether one was or was not a believer in any religion)
>> and was even against
> the drinking of tea. Does that mean that we
>> think that his vision of 'Ram
> Rajya' would be identical to what
>> Aalok Aima considers to be an Islamic
> state?
>>
>> Incidentally, the state of Gujarat, has consistently imposed
> total
>> prohibition in deference to M.K. Gandhi's ideas on prohibition for
> as
>> long as it has existed as a state of the Indian Union. So, as per Mr.
>>
> Aima's suggestion, would we now be prepared to admit that Mr. Modi's
>>
> Gujarat (and the Gujarat of all his predecessors) is the closest we
>> have
> come to having an 'islamic State' in India. Oh no, the closest
>> we actually
> came to being an Islamic state in India was actually
>> during Morarji Desai;s
> prime ministership, when some of the current
>> champions of Hindutva were in
> power, when total prohibition was
>> imposed on all of India. In fact we came
> even closer than the vision
>> of SAS Geelani, which at least allows the
> 'non-believer' his or her
>> daily tipple? Incidentally, Mr. Geelani went on
> to suggest that if a
>> bottle of alchohl belongiing to a non believer was
> willingly or
>> unwillingly damaged by a Muslim, then the state would have
> to
>> compensate the non-believer for that damage. I haven;t quite heard of
>>
> an Islamic state willing to pay people to drink alchohl (if their
>> bottle
> has been damaged). He went on to quote an 'aayat' that said -
>> "Muslims, do
> not insult even the idols (but) of the idol worshippers,
>> for they will
> insult your God in return" and that the obligations of
>> humanity are binding
> in our relations even with those we consider to
>> be our enemies.
> Interesting stuff, coming as it does from the man
>> who is so offen held up
> as a figure of inflexible bigotry.
>>
>> By the way, none of this means that
> I agree with Mr. SAS Geelani;s
>> vision of the future. I am merely stating
> the facts that I know and
>> witnessed.
>>
>> best
>>
>> Shuddha
>>
>>
>>
> On 22-Oct-10, at 2:38 PM, cashmeeri wrote:
>>
>>
>> Geelani announced
> one Article of the Constitution of Free
>> Kashmir - its "Liquor
> Policy":
>>
>> http://www.prokerala.com/news/articles/a176267.html
>>
>>
> "The system of justice in an independent Jammu and Kashmir
>> would be such
> that even liquor would not be banned for non-Muslims.
>> It would be
> prohibited fo......r the Muslim majority but if
>> minorities feel they want
> to have liquor they would be allowed to
>> consume as their right,"
>>
>>
> Hello!!!! Hello!!!!
>> I thought it was going to be a Secular Free
> Kashmir. This
>> sounds suspiciously like an Islamic Free Kashmir.
>>
>>
> Interesting prospect : Free Kashmir ..... no Non-Muslims .....
>> no
> Liquor
>>
>> Maybe it is the "Tourism Policy"
>>
>> .............
> aalok aima
>>
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________
>>
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
>> Critiques
> & Collaborations
>> To subscribe: send an email to
> reader-list-request at sarai.net
>> with subscribe in the subject header.
>>
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>>
> List archive: <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>>
>>
>>
> Shuddhabrata Sengupta
>> The Sarai Programme at CSDS
>> Raqs Media
> Collective
>> shuddha at sarai.net
>> www.sarai.net
>>
> www.raqsmediacollective.net
>>
>>
>>
> _________________________________________
>> reader-list: an open discussion
> list on media and the city.
>> Critiques & Collaborations
>> To subscribe:
> send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>> subscribe in the
> subject header.
>> To unsubscribe:
> https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>> List archive:
> <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>>
>>
>>
> _________________________________________
>> reader-list: an open discussion
> list on media and the city.
>> Critiques & Collaborations
>> To subscribe:
> send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>> subscribe in the
> subject header.
>> To unsubscribe:
> https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>> List archive:
> <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>> Reply
>>
>> Reply to
> all
>>
>> Forward
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:49 PM, TaraPrakash
> <taraprakash at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> The point probably the mailer was
> making and you are missing is that the
>>> assumption is that SASG's "free"
> Kashmir will be primarily an Islamic
>>> state
>>> that will allow some
> unislamic things to happen. This is the same vision
>>> of
>>> Hindu Rashtra
> that Advani was selling to Indians when BJP was being seen
>>> as
>>> taking
> power away in India.
>>>
>>> That you don't necessarily agree with SASG makes
> no freaking sense to me
>>> especially when you have unequivocally blatantly
> unskeptically defended
>>> and
>>> justified SASG on this forum. By becoming a
> SASG stooge you have joined
>>> the
>>> ranks of RSS. By putting SASG and MK
> Gandhi in the same sentence you
>>> killed
>>> the embodiment of nonviolence
> once more, and joined RSS ranks in more
>>> than
>>> one
> way.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shuddhabrata
> Sengupta"
>>> <shuddha at sarai.net>
>>> To: "cashmeeri"
> <cashmeeri at yahoo.com>
>>> Cc: "Sarai" <reader-list at sarai.net>
>>> Sent:
> Friday, October 22, 2010 5:33 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] Geelani
> announced one Article of the
>>> Constitutionof Free Kashmir - its "Liquor
> Policy"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, on these grounds, Syed Ali Shah Geelani is
> more moderate than
>>>> Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, who advocated total
> prohibition, (regardless
>>>> of
>>>> whether one was or was not a believer in
> any religion) and was even
>>>> against
>>>> the drinking of tea. Does that
> mean that we think that his vision of
>>>> 'Ram
>>>> Rajya' would be identical
> to what Aalok Aima considers to be an Islamic
>>>> state?
>>>>
>>>>
> Incidentally, the state of Gujarat, has consistently imposed total
>>>>
> prohibition in deference to M.K. Gandhi's ideas on prohibition for as
>>>>
> long
>>>> as it has existed as a state of the Indian Union. So, as per Mr.
> Aima's
>>>> suggestion, would we now be prepared to admit that Mr. Modi's
> Gujarat
>>>> (and
>>>> the Gujarat of all his predecessors) is the closest we
> have come to
>>>> having
>>>> an 'islamic State' in India. Oh no, the closest
> we actually came to
>>>> being
>>>> an Islamic state in India was actually
> during Morarji Desai;s prime
>>>> ministership, when some of the current
> champions of Hindutva were in
>>>> power,
>>>> when total prohibition was
> imposed on all of India. In fact we came even
>>>> closer than the vision of
> SAS Geelani, which at least allows the
>>>> 'non-believer' his or her daily
> tipple? Incidentally, Mr. Geelani went
>>>> on
>>>> to suggest that if a
> bottle of alchohl belongiing to a non believer was
>>>> willingly or
> unwillingly damaged by a Muslim, then the state would have
>>>> to
>>>>
> compensate the non-believer for that damage. I haven;t quite heard of an
>>>>
> Islamic state willing to pay people to drink alchohl (if their bottle
>>>>
> has
>>>> been damaged). He went on to quote an 'aayat' that said - "Muslims,
> do
>>>> not
>>>> insult even the idols (but) of the idol worshippers, for they
> will
>>>> insult
>>>> your God in return" and that the obligations of humanity
> are binding in
>>>> our
>>>> relations even with those we consider to be our
> enemies. Interesting
>>>> stuff, coming as it does from the man who is so
> offen held up as a
>>>> figure
>>>> of inflexible bigotry.
>>>>
>>>> By the
> way, none of this means that I agree with Mr. SAS Geelani;s
>>>> vision
>>>>
> of the future. I am merely stating the facts that I know and
> witnessed.
>>>>
>>>> best
>>>>
>>>> Shuddha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 22-Oct-10, at
> 2:38 PM, cashmeeri wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Geelani announced one Article of the
> Constitution of Free Kashmir - its
>>>>> "Liquor Policy":
>>>>>
>>>>>
> http://www.prokerala.com/news/articles/a176267.html
>>>>>
>>>>> "The system of
> justice in an independent Jammu and Kashmir would be
>>>>> such
>>>>> that
> even liquor would not be banned for non-Muslims. It would be
>>>>> prohibited
> fo......r the Muslim majority but if minorities feel they
>>>>> want
>>>>> to
> have liquor they would be allowed to consume as their right,"
>>>>>
>>>>>
> Hello!!!! Hello!!!!
>>>>> I thought it was going to be a Secular Free Kashmir.
> This sounds
>>>>> suspiciously like an Islamic Free Kashmir.
>>>>>
>>>>>
> Interesting prospect : Free Kashmir ..... no Non-Muslims ..... no
>>>>>
> Liquor
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe it is the "Tourism Policy"
>>>>>
>>>>> .............
> aalok aima
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
> _________________________________________
>>>>> reader-list: an open
> discussion list on media and the city.
>>>>> Critiques & Collaborations
>>>>>
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>>>>>
> subscribe in the subject header.
>>>>> To unsubscribe:
> https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>>>>> List archive:
> <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> Shuddhabrata Sengupta
>>>> The Sarai Programme at CSDS
>>>> Raqs Media
> Collective
>>>> shuddha at sarai.net
>>>> www.sarai.net
>>>>
> www.raqsmediacollective.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> _________________________________________
>>>> reader-list: an open discussion
> list on media and the city.
>>>> Critiques & Collaborations
>>>> To subscribe:
> send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>>>> subscribe in the
> subject header.
>>>> To unsubscribe:
> https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>>>> List archive:
> <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
> _________________________________________
>>> reader-list: an open discussion
> list on media and the city.
>>> Critiques & Collaborations
>>> To subscribe:
> send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>>> subscribe
>>> in the
> subject header.
>>> To unsubscribe:
> https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>>> List archive:
> <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
> http://indersalim.livejournal.com
>>
> _________________________________________
>> reader-list: an open discussion
> list on media and the city.
>> Critiques & Collaborations
>> To subscribe:
> send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
>> subscribe in the
> subject header.
>> To unsubscribe:
> https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
>> List archive:
> <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>>
>
>
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion
> list on media and the city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send
> an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe in the subject
> header.
> To unsubscribe:
> https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> List archive:
> <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>
_________________________
> ________________
reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the
> city.
Critiques & Collaborations
To subscribe: send an email to
> reader-list-request at sarai.net with subscribe in the subject header.
To
> unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
List archive:
> <https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
More information about the reader-list
mailing list