[Reader-list] Fwd: Temples Of Mirpur

[A.K. Malik]

Sorry, there was a small slip. it is final decision by the Supreme Court.
(A.K.MALIK)


--- On Sat, 8/1/09, A.K. Malik <akmalik45 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: A.K. Malik <akmalik45 at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Reader-list] Fwd: Temples Of Mirpur
> To: "Murali V" <murali.chalam at gmail.com>
> Cc: "Sarai List" <reader-list at sarai.net>
> Date: Saturday, August 1, 2009, 11:23 PM
> 
> Dear Murali Ji,
>                 In
> spite of reading Rakesh's views on secularism, I tend to
> agree with your views. Gujarat High Court in a petition had
> ordered all religious places built on public land to be
> demolished. Several temples built on/near roads on public
> places were demolished and no eyebrows raised. The moment a
> couple of mosques similarly placed were razed there was hue
> and cry and our dear Central Govt appealed against the
> decision of the Gujarat H.C.,final decision of which has
> recently been given by the Govt.This is the equality we have
> with the authority of the Constitution of India.
> (A.K.MALIK)
> 
> 
> --- On Fri, 7/31/09, Murali V <murali.chalam at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > From: Murali V <murali.chalam at gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Reader-list] Fwd: Temples Of Mirpur
> > To: "Rajendra Bhat Uppinangadi" <rajen786uppinangady at gmail.com>
> > Cc: "Sarai Reader List" <reader-list at sarai.net>
> > Date: Friday, July 31, 2009, 3:41 PM
> > Dear Rakeshji,
> > It has come to a stage where the vote bank politics
> has
> > taken over and the
> > majority are on the receiving end thanks to the
> > pseudo-secular agenda. All
> > have been brainwashed to forget history. A hindu if
> he
> > claims openly to be a
> > hindu is considered fanatic, but the rest are taken as
> a
> > right.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > V Murali
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Rajendra Bhat
> Uppinangadi
> > <
> > rajen786uppinangady at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > Rakeshjee,
> > >   muslims become zombies after they
> > hear their mullas after the prayers of
> > > zumma, may be you have not seen their actions as
> they
> > come out of the
> > > mosque
> > > and take laws in to their own hands, as they
> outnumber
> > at that point of
> > > time
> > > after prayers, till then they are ok but these
> prayers
> > which are mandatory
> > > are perhaps used to make them hate others for
> > perceived injustice.
> > >
> > > Recent violence at Mysore well organised by
> "Poplar
> > front of democracy" is
> > > headed by very secular hinds now cooling their
> backs
> > in detention, all came
> > > from Kerala to foment trouble in Karnataka. The
> MLA,
> > disgruntled one at
> > > that, Tanveer Sait is under scrutiny for "help"
> to
> > gulp the wakf lands
> > > which led to ugly violence, with help from
> "secular"
> > fronts.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajen.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Rakesh Iyer
> <rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Pawan ji
> > > >
> > > > I have no issues with your putting pictures.
> But
> > the way some people are
> > > > going about on this issue is totally
> horrendous.
> > My concern is simply
> > > this:
> > > > we on this forum are simply not debating or
> > discussing issues which are
> > > > really for the people. I don't say that
> temple
> > destruction is not an
> > > issue
> > > > for the people, but to completely mix it
> with
> > Muslim-bashing, is that
> > > > acceptable?
> > > >
> > > > I know I made that comment about the IOK.
> But
> > what I would like to know
> > > is
> > > > that when it keeps on coming, it seems the
> only
> > objective left behind on
> > > > this forum is Muslim-bashing. Muslims are
> > supposed to be portrayed as
> > > only
> > > > men having destructive mentality, rapists,
> > killers, butchers or even
> > > > perpetrators of injustice in simple terms.
> And my
> > point is that I don't
> > > > accept this view.
> > > >
> > > > I also asked the question to know from all
> > whether they have some idea
> > > > behind putting such pictures or writing
> such
> > views, and whether it is to
> > > > avenge the destruction of temples or
> renovating
> > them or something else.
> > > You
> > > > could have simply stated the same. Of
> course, for
> > the rest, it's
> > > difficult
> > > > to digest even Muslim presence I believe in
> this
> > nation, forget the world
> > > of
> > > > course.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Rakesh
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Rajen.
> > > _________________________________________
> > > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and
> the
> > city.
> > > Critiques & Collaborations
> > > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net
> > with
> > > subscribe in the subject header.
> > > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> > >
> > _________________________________________
> > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the
> > city.
> > Critiques & Collaborations
> > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net
> > with subscribe in the subject header.
> > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list 
> > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> 
> 
>       
> _________________________________________
> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the
> city.
> Critiques & Collaborations
> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net
> with subscribe in the subject header.
> To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list 
> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>