[Reader-list] would you do this favour for the Delhi state also.?

[Rajen Uppinangadi]

Dear Rakesh,

    so one more stone for Modi....!  The truth of the matter is the report
that you have put is all about the procedural matter of utilising or
under-utilising of funds by the state, and common sense and little
background knowledge will keep this clarity, budget of the union government
takes place in the last day of Feb, and the states gets funds for the plan
expenditure only by July of that year, after submission of lots of paper
work, and further to utilise the funds from Centre, the process of tender,
and utilisation in specified , approved project are further redtapes undoing
the good use of funds for any state, CAG does not go into reasons, but only
points out the use and unused funds, so every state has issues of this
malady. Further with frequent elections of the panchayath, state elections,
loksabha elections, half the times of an year is the states are under model
code of conducts, not able to take up any development work.! Request you to
keep  these facts also in mind while assessing the works of all the states.

Regards,

Rajen.

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Rakesh Iyer <rakesh.rnbdj at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Rajen jee
>
> I knew that once the truth about Modi is out in the open, people will say
> 'so what? Are other chief ministers too good and Modi is too bad?' That is
> not the point though I was making by putting up that mail.
>
> What I wish to state is that Modi has unnecessarily propped up an image of
> his through which people are mistaken. People say he is not corrupt, but in
> his very government, there are ministers who have been involved in
> embezzling funds of cooperative banks. If supporting such ministers is not
> corruption, what is corruption then? He and his party accused Manmohan Singh
> of protecting Shibu Soren who was absconding while he was a minister. But
> when Maya ben Kodnani was also absconding, he didn't remove her from the
> ministry. Then how is he different from Manmohan?
>
> He couldn't prevent Godhra, neither could he prevent the violence which
> occurred after it. He and his govt. portrayed Godhra first as an ISI action.
> If one ISI action can spark so huge a violence, imagine if Narendra Modi
> were to be the PM of India. One terrorist attack is all it would take to
> ensure a genocide throughout India, destroying its secular fabric forever.
> Is that what we want?
>
> Narendra Modi had said during campaigning in 2002 Gujarat assembly
> elections, that if the Congress won, Pakistan would celebrate and if the BJP
> won India would celebrate. I don't know the link between Congress and
> Pakistan, but ironically BJP's victory must have made the ISI very happy at
> the fact that one action only attributed to them (not even proved) was
> enough to create a riot; when they really attack India, it will be enough to
> finish India internally without a single shot fired by the Pakistani army.
>
> And in this mail, I have talked the language of nationalists. So now
> decide, when the BJP wins, who celebrates: India, or the anti-India elements
> in Pakistan?
>
> As for Sheila Dikshit, Rajen jee, don;t worry, first I will put some more
> facts of Modi and his govt. and then I will take Sheila jee's truth out in
> the open. Hope that is fine.
>
> Regards
>
> Rakesh
>