[Reader-list] AMAN KI AASHA

Aditya Raj Kaul kauladityaraj at gmail.com
Thu Feb 18 17:46:53 IST 2010 

Dear Anupam,

I wonder how can you manage contradicting yourself just so many times within
minutes. You ask me to react to your detailed understanding and then claim
the mail was meant for Kshmendra.

Just because you regard IANS better than other newspaper/agencies doesn't
mean everyone must agree to the same.

I am no one to decide what happened there. I wasn't the one to witness the
incident neither did I report it.

Whenever I meet my 3 year old nephew, he politely asks me for a gift and
then says 'so you will get it soon'. ok? In hope he remains, I like behavior
of such cute kids.

regards

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:27 PM, anupam chakravartty <c.anupam at gmail.com>wrote:

> Dear Aditya,
>
> The mail was meant for Kshmendra, so let's see what he has to say.
> Thanks for sharing the link. I think the PTI report that you have
> cited is not worthy enough to be believed as there is another version
> of the story by IANS which says the guards were tied up.
>
> Now you decide: were these guards tied up by the insurgents? or they
> were left unharmed? OK?
>
> -Anupam
>
>
>
> On 2/18/10, Aditya Raj Kaul <kauladityaraj at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dear Anupam
> >
> > The first two lines of your recent e-mail on the list read as follows -
> > *
> > "I am sorry if you are visually impaired. I did not know this. I wish I
> > had a software by which I could read out the news report in question."*
> >
> > I didn't find it worth enough to read the e-mail further. The above lines
> > unfortunately are applicable on your good self. I share with you the link
> -
> >
> >
> http://www.ptinews.com/news/521987_Militants-attack-cop-post-near-Srinagar--loot-weapons
> >
> > I don't doubt the news report. So I rest my case.
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Aditya Raj Kaul
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:13 PM, anupam chakravartty
> > <c.anupam at gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Dear Aditya,
> >>
> >> I understand you are not spokesperson for PTI. I do not think PTI
> >> would have been really pleased with you for posting a developing
> >> story. More so, because I searched through PTI archives today as well,
> >> I have not found the input that was posted by you. So if you could
> >> kindly cooperate and state your sources here it would be very helpful.
> >>
> >> And I have stated why I doubt the claims made the news report in my
> >> reply to Kshmendra's mail. Would definitely look forward to your reply
> >> Aditya. I thank you again for sharing this with us. It speaks a lot
> >> about the kind of news coming out of the valley.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Anupam
> >>
> >> On 2/18/10, Aditya Raj Kaul <kauladityaraj at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Dear Anupam,
> >> >
> >> > I am not a spokesperson of Press Trust of India (PTI). Does that
> answer
> >> your
> >> > questions?
> >> >
> >> > I shared an important news item with the list; because I didn't want
> it
> >> to
> >> > be missed. How can you say I didn't follow the news; when it is me who
> >> > shared it will the members here on Sarai!?!
> >> >
> >> > I think someone already has clarified your misconception or
> >> 'contradiction'
> >> > as you say. I don't think every time I am required to guide you.
> >> >
> >> > While you choose to not ignore 'trash'; you should as well refrain
> from
> >> > spreading the same 'trash' and not waste our valuable time in useless
> >> > discussion.
> >> >
> >> > thanks
> >> >
> >> > Aditya Raj Kaul
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 3:00 PM, anupam chakravartty
> >> > <c.anupam at gmail.com>wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Dear Aditya,
> >> >>
> >> >> It is unfortunate that you did not bother to follow an important news
> >> >> that you had posted on this list. Very patiently I had read it and
> >> >> pointed out some contradictions which you have not been able to
> >> >> confirm. I am afraid I had to point out these facts because you
> cannot
> >> >> say things like: '"trash' might just be of 'value' to someone else on
> >> >> the list. Even if it isn't, you can choose to ignore and not devalue
> >> >> someone's contribution to the list by calling it names." I am sorry I
> >> >> cannot follow your direction on choosing to ignore trash if you or
> >> >> anyone posts it on this list.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Anupam
> >> >>
> >> >> On 2/18/10, Aditya Raj Kaul <kauladityaraj at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Dear Friends
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Something Shri Shuddhabrata Sengupta calls 'trash' might just be of
> >> >> 'value'
> >> >> > to someone else on the list. Even if it isn't, you can choose to
> >> ignore
> >> >> and
> >> >> > not devalue someone's contribution to the list by calling it names.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I hope the words you preach gives you the patience to take
> criticism
> >> >> > yourself which unfortunately you haven't been able to do.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > We are open to discussion, debate and criticism. But, how can we
> move
> >> >> ahead
> >> >> > ignoring the basic courtesy of 'freedom of one's opinion'. Or is it
> >> >> > 'liberty' just for the moderators and not members of this forum.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If the moderators only want their viewpoints to be followed, let
> them
> >> >> enjoy
> >> >> > and also please let me know so that I can back out and let one
> >> >> > opinion
> >> >> flow
> >> >> > in the network.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > regards
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Aditya Raj Kaul
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Shuddhabrata Sengupta
> >> >> > <shuddha at sarai.net>wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Dear Rakesh,
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Of course the poem is trash. And of course any person with a taste
> >> for
> >> >> >> trash has the right to send trash on to the list. I am not at all
> >> >> >> disputing
> >> >> >> the right of any person to subject us to garbage. And of course we
> >> >> should
> >> >> >> read such things patiently. I always do.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> But, the right to send trash on to the list comes with the
> >> >> >> corresponding
> >> >> >> obligation to be prepared to be criticised for having done so.
> That
> >> is
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> responsibility that comes with practising the freedom of speech.
>  I
> >> am
> >> >> >> always open to be criticised on this list, provided the criticism
> is
> >> >> >> not
> >> >> >> defamatory or libel. I hope everyone else is as well.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> best
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Shuddha
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 17-Feb-10, at 5:29 PM, Rakesh Iyer wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> The poem is a complete trash as it completely refuses to
> understand
> >> >> >> that
> >> >> >> all
> >> >> >> Pakistanis are not of one kind and can't be brought under a single
> >> >> >> umbrella
> >> >> >> of being those who are responsible for perpetrating terrorism. At
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> same
> >> >> >> time, we should be prepared and have the patience to read and hear
> >> such
> >> >> >> comments. Infact, it's not our mistake. Long back, when India had
> >> >> >> chosen
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> path to be democratic, Nehru had said that India is for all. The
> end
> >> >> >> result
> >> >> >> is there for all to see. It's for all kinds of religious
> >> >> >> fundamentalists
> >> >> >> and
> >> >> >> secular humanity-oriented people who are against each other. We
> are
> >> >> >> a
> >> >> >> nation
> >> >> >> of extremes and variations. So nothing wrong in writing such poems
> >> from
> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> freedom of speech point of view.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> But yes, the poem is a trash in terms of it's content,
> objectively.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Rakesh
> >> >> >> _________________________________________
> >> >> >> reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> >> >> >> Critiques & Collaborations
> >> >> >> To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> >> >> >> subscribe in the subject header.
> >> >> >> To unsubscribe:
> https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> >> >> >> List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Shuddhabrata Sengupta
> >> >> >> The Sarai Programme at CSDS
> >> >> >> Raqs Media Collective
> >> >> >> shuddha at sarai.net
> >> >> >> www.sarai.net
> >> >> >> www.raqsmediacollective.net
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Aditya Raj Kaul
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Freelance Writer
> >> >> > Blog: http://activistsdiary.blogspot.com/
> >> >> > _________________________________________
> >> >> > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> >> >> > Critiques & Collaborations
> >> >> > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> >> >> subscribe
> >> >> > in the subject header.
> >> >> > To unsubscribe:
> https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> >> >> > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Aditya Raj Kaul
> >> >
> >> > Freelance Writer
> >> > Cell -  +91-9873297834
> >> >
> >> > Blog: http://activistsdiary.blogspot.com/
> >> > _________________________________________
> >> > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> >> > Critiques & Collaborations
> >> > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> >> subscribe
> >> > in the subject header.
> >> > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> >> > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Aditya Raj Kaul
> >
> > Freelance Writer
> > Cell -  +91-9873297834
> >
> > Blog: http://activistsdiary.blogspot.com/
> > _________________________________________
> > reader-list: an open discussion list on media and the city.
> > Critiques & Collaborations
> > To subscribe: send an email to reader-list-request at sarai.net with
> subscribe
> > in the subject header.
> > To unsubscribe: https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/reader-list
> > List archive: &lt;https://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/reader-list/>
>



-- 
Aditya Raj Kaul

Freelance Writer
Cell -  +91-9873297834

Blog: http://activistsdiary.blogspot.com/

More information about the reader-list mailing list